Application Social safety and culture

Bring to light what is really going on.

Social safety, integrity or the aftermath of an incident: topics where people only speak freely when nobody knows who says what. One live dialogue surfaces what surveys and reporting channels miss.

The occasion Improve social safety

There are signals that social safety is not good, but it is hard to find out exactly what is going on; face-to-face does not bring everything to the surface.

What you achieve
  • Insight behind signals
  • Sensitive experiences open to discussion
  • Set direction together for desired behaviour

On sensitive topics the usual instruments fall short. In a traceable survey people phrase things cautiously, and reporting channels mainly receive what is already being reported formally.

An anonymous dialogue lets people respond without exposing themselves. They can recognise signals, add to them and weigh measures.

The approach 3 steps

From question to a next step people stand behind

We guide every step. What we mainly ask of you is substance: two meetings beforehand and a co-moderator during the session.

  1. Step 1

    Bring to light what is really going on.

    Through an anonymous dialogue, gather experiences that are otherwise hard to voice.

    Example“What makes it hard in your team to raise something?”

  2. Step 2

    Understand the underlying causes.

    Explore experiences, patterns and behaviours behind the signals.

    ExampleMany messages are about the same pattern: whoever reports something hears nothing more about it afterwards.

  3. Step 3

    Take the step towards desired behaviour together.

    Involve employees in what needs to change in how people treat each other.

    Example“What should a colleague do when he or she sees behaviour that crosses a line?”

Curious what participants see on their screen during the session?

See the participant screen

Example Improve social safety

What the dialogue can look like

A fictional example: the question you ask, what participants write and which messages get the most support.

Social safety in the departments

There are signals, but the picture is still unclear.

The question
  1. What makes it hard in your team to raise something?
  2. What would help you speak more freely?
What participants write
  • If you report something, you never hear anything about it again.84% agree
  • Jokes sometimes cross a line, but nobody says anything.77% agree
Most support
  1. If you report something, you never hear anything about it again.84% agree
  2. I don't know what happens to what I report.80% agree
  3. Jokes sometimes cross a line, but nobody says anything.77% agree
  4. Whoever speaks up stands alone.74% agree

Why Upvoice

Why Upvoice for this topic

  1. 01

    Anonymity

  2. 02

    Qualitative depth

  3. 03

    Scale

  4. 04

    Broadly supported insights

What you receive 4 parts

A report the organisation can act on

You see the main themes during the session itself. The synthesis follows the same day.

  1. 01

    Signals with broad support

  2. 02

    Nuance and differences without traceability

  3. 03

    Measures ranked by support

  4. 04

    Reporting for the board, HR and the works council

With Synthetron Full service

This is how we guide your question

You work with a dedicated guide who knows your sector. You provide most of the content. We make sure the dialogue runs smoothly and the outcome is usable.

  1. 01

    Question and design

    We sharpen your question together and design the rounds, the invitation and the communication to participants.

  2. 02

    Live guidance

    During the session we moderate, probe what stands out and make sure everyone takes part safely and anonymously.

  3. 03

    Interpretation and report

    We analyse the outcomes and turn them into a report with recommendations your organisation can build on.

How it worked out for others

Read what the dialogue delivered in each project.

Questions about improve social safety

Is your question not listed? Ask it in an introductory call.

Does this replace a reporting point or confidential adviser?

No. Those routes remain necessary for individual reports. The dialogue shows which experiences and preconditions are more widely felt.

How do you protect anonymity?

Each participant receives a random code instead of a name, and groups are only reported on separately from eight participants. That threshold is fixed; in advance you choose which groups you want to see separately.

What if something serious comes up during the session?

In advance we agree how to handle that, and we point participants to the existing routes for individual reports. The dialogue itself stays about patterns, not people.

Who gets to see the outcome?

You decide that in advance. Often the report goes to the board, HR and works council, and participants receive a summary with the next steps.

Related From this area and beyond.

Related applications

Ask one question of everyone it concerns

In a demo we show you how your question works as a dialogue: what you ask, who you invite and what you'll have at the end.