From three core values to recognisable behaviour
More than 700 employees each described what a new culture means in their everyday work. The result became a culture compass.
Read the case study for GasunieApplication Honesty on sensitive topics
Psychological safety, integrity or the aftermath of an incident: topics where people only speak freely when nobody knows who says what. One live dialogue surfaces what surveys and reporting channels miss.
The occasion Psychological safety
On sensitive topics the usual instruments fall short. In a traceable survey people phrase things cautiously, and reporting channels mainly receive what is already being reported formally.
An anonymous dialogue lets people respond without exposing themselves. They can recognise signals, add to them and weigh measures.
The approach 3 steps
We guide every step. What we mainly ask of you is substance: two meetings beforehand and a co-moderator during the session.
We define the right questions, anonymity boundaries and reporting levels in advance.
Participants write what they see and what they need to speak more freely.
The outcome is translated into usable reporting without exposing individual reports or small groups.
Curious what participants see on their screen during the session?
See the participant screenWhat you receive 4 parts
You see the main themes during the session itself. The synthesis follows the same day.
Cases In practice
Read what the dialogue delivered in each project.
More than 700 employees each described what a new culture means in their everyday work. The result became a culture compass.
Read the case study for Gasunie
For the Enforcement Strategy, SZW heard enforcers and citizens on one day, each in a dialogue of their own.
Read the case study for Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment (SZW)
Care organisation Westerkim shifted its focus from care to residents' wellbeing. Employees, volunteers and family helped determine the direction.
Read the case study for WesterkimIs your question not listed? Ask it in an introductory call.
No. Those routes remain necessary for individual reports. The dialogue shows which experiences and preconditions are shared more widely.
Contributions cannot be traced back to individuals and small groups are not reported separately. We agree those boundaries in advance.
Every application works with the same live dialogue.
The survey results are in, but the why is missing. One dialogue around the key scores delivers a prioritised action list.
View: deepen your employee surveyA reorganisation, merger or measure has to land. Gauge the concerns before you break the news, and again afterwards.
View: changeThere is a plan on the table. Test where the support is and which objections you need to take seriously.
View: test a decisionA strategy only works when people understand it and dare to question it. Let teams and layers respond to it.
View: strategyHear large groups in one hour and make visible where they differ and which direction gets support.
View: consultationDo not wait for signals to escalate. A fixed dialogue calendar lets leadership hear periodically what is changing.
View: continuous listeningIn a demo we show you how your question works as a dialogue: what you ask, who you invite and what you'll have at the end.